Some Causes of Fertility Rates Movements

Claire Norville

Rocio Gomez

Robert L. Brownish


Male fertility patterns are very different between countries and over time. Many different factors can affect the fertility level. This newspaper will go over the different elements that have an effect on the virility rate. Some are economic while some are sociable. The economic factors will be based in the theories of Rich Easterlin, Diane Macunovich, Butz & Keep, and David Ermisch. The social factors that will be designed here are relevant to race, education, religion, contraceptive use, child killingilligal baby killing, immigration, relationship, cohabitation, divorce, age of marital life, female involvement in the labor force, teenage male fertility and federal government programs.

Several Causes of Male fertility Rate Moves



A fertility level is a way of measuring the average number of children a lady will have during her having children years. The fertility patterns are different between countries and also time. Various factors may affect fertility prices. Many of these elements are challenging to measure since they entail subjectivity and some of them may not apply throughout cultures. This makes it especially difficult to find variables which can be used to foresee future fertility rates.

Through the peak many years of the baby boom (in the late 1950's), the fertility rate was 3. 91 in Canada and 3. 77 in the U. S.. By the 1970's it had fallen below 2 in both countries. While the U. S. price went back about 2 . 08, Canada's rate kept slipping to 1. 52 in 1999. Such differences in male fertility exist possibly in countries as similar as Canada and the U. S.. Many developed countries in The european union are also below the replacement amount of 2 . 1, but the U. S. continues to be near this kind of rate. This is a huge distance, which raises the question: " Why this big difference? ”.

Fertility costs are still in very high amounts in Africa and some Persia countries, implemented next by the countries of Central and South America. Reduce rates are simply in European countries and other developing countries like Canada and Japan.

This kind of paper can analyze the changing behaviour of communities throughout the world with an influence in fertility prices. Characteristics that influence changes in fertility costs are related either with all the economic situation or perhaps with cultural patterns. Some of the social factors that can influence fertility prices are: race, level of education, religion, use of contraceptive methods, abortion, impact of immigrantion, children as a supply of labor (on family farms), children since support intended for couples at older ages, costs of raising kids, female labor force participation, authorities programs to encourage or perhaps discourage childbearing, postponement of marriage, age of first labor and birth and divorce rates.

A lot of Causes of Fertility Rate Moves



Demographic tendencies

There has been a shift in behaviour in many societies. This could be seen in many factors just like: postponement of marriage, increasing age of initial birth, increasing divorce rates, lower relationship rates, even more births outdoors marriage, progressively more women inside the labor force, greater levels of education for women, a decreasing need for children to compliment elderly parents, a switch from countryside to downtown societies and government programs to encourage or decrease having children. Together with these factors, general mortality rates have dropped, leading to improvements in life expectancy which continue in most countries. Also, many advances in medical technologies are being realized including improvements in birth control methods and progress in the treatment or good treatment of a large number of diseases.

A mixture of all of these elements has triggered three key demographic developments: reductions in infant mortality, increasing life span and lessening fertility costs. These styles contribute to a great altered age group structure, leading to an ageing population during many designed...

Bibliography: BГ©langer, A., Ouellet, G. 2001. " A comparative study of recent trends in Canadian and

American Male fertility, 1998-1999”

Bianchi, Suzanne M., Daphne Italy. 1986. " American Girls in Transition”. Russell Sage


Butz, William P. and Eileen P. Ward. 1977. " The Beginning of Countercyclical U. S.

Drew, Eileen. 2000. " Reconceptualising families in the EUROPEAN UNION: Changes in demography,

households as well as the allocation of care”

Easterlin, Richard A. 1987. " Birth and Fortune- The effect of numbers on personal welfare

next edition”

Economist, The. " Half a billion dollars Americans? ” Aug twenty two, 2002.

Ermisch, John. 1983. " The Political Economy of Demographic Change”. Dessin Publishing


Global developments in human population and human development. year 1994. World Methods Institute,

Education Center

Keyfitz, Nathan. 70. " Just how Birth Control Impacts Births”. Daily news No . four. Harvard


Khayat, Abdullah. 1994. " A Problem for Palestine: Gaza 's Birthrate Highest in Middle

East” Washington, Deb. C

Macunovich, Diane T. 1996. " Social Security and Retirees- an economist's perspective”.

Countrywide Vital Figures Reports. Volume level 50, Amount 5. Feb 12, 2002. Department of

Health & Human solutions.

Omran, Abdel R, Roudi, Farzaneh. 1993. " The center East Human population Puzzle”. Populace

Bulletin in the Population Guide Bureau

Romaniuc, A. 1984. " Current Demographic Evaluation, Fertility canada: from baby-boom

to baby-bust”

Tsui, Amy Ong, Donald J. Coquillage and Dennis P. Hogan. 1978. " A Work Policy for a Family

Planning Analysis of World Fertility Survey Data”

United Nations. The Sex and Age Distribution of the World Masse. 1998 Modification,

Volume II: Sex and Age.

United Nations Educational, Technological, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). 1990.

United Nations Population Department (UNPD). 1992. " Demographic Indicators 1950-2025”.

Wattenberg, Ben. 1998. " Two Billion dollars Never-Borns! " American Organization Institute.